Where the Apeiris corpus is deep, and where we are deepening it.
This page is Apeiris’s own roadmap for the corpus. It shows where we add sources and mappings next — where our sourcing is already deep, first-class, and direct, and which controls we will source more deeply next. Every focus area here is an Apeiris sourcing priority, not an adopter task.
Depth guide & research priorities
Two founder questions, answered from the live corpus: where should we look for depth, and where should Apeiris deepen its own sourcing next. Apeiris ranks the 12 domains by how much of each is grounded by a direct, first-class source — then, for any domain, names the sources most worth reading for depth and the controls that are the clearest focus areas for deeper sourcing. These research priorities are Apeiris’s own roadmap — where we add sources next — not adopter tasks.
Where Apeiris deepens next · shallowest first
Loading depth guide…
Best places to look for depth
The source families that most strongly ground this domain — each with the control, requirement, and why it fits.
Where Apeiris will deepen sourcing next
Controls whose strongest source today is only partial or adjacent — the constructive focus areas on Apeiris’s sourcing roadmap.
Method: direct coverage counts controls with at least one direct, first-class source; best-for-depth ranks sources by how many of a domain's controls they satisfy at direct fit, with control-and-requirement evidence; research priorities are controls whose strongest source is still only partial or adjacent, shown with the closest current source. Apeiris defines these mappings; the platform layer evaluates action context against them at runtime.
Risk-weighted coverage
Depth should track risk: the controls that gate the highest-capability actions deserve the deepest sourcing. This view groups every control by its capability tier — frontier, elevated, and down — and shows how deeply each tier is grounded, so you can read at a glance whether corroboration follows capability. The highest-risk controls with the lightest direct backing are named first, as Apeiris’s constructive priority to deepen — items on our sourcing roadmap.
Depth by capability tier · highest-risk first
| Capability tier | Controls | Avg depth | % with direct source |
|---|
Frontier and elevated tiers gate the highest-capability actions. A full depth bar means nearly every control in the tier has a direct, first-class source; a shorter bar is the clearest invitation to deepen.
Highest-risk controls to deepen first
High-capability controls whose strongest source today is partial or adjacent — the constructive priority on Apeiris’s sourcing roadmap, not shortfalls.
Method: each control is placed in its capability tier and scored by best assessed source fit; a tier's depth is the mean, and % with direct counts controls with at least one direct source. Apeiris defines these mappings; the platform layer evaluates action context against them at runtime.
Where control strength is thin
Looked at across all twelve domains, the coverage manifests, and the threat and risk lenses, the data itself points to where deeper controls would matter most. These assertions update automatically as the corpus grows — each number is recomputed from opportunities.json, never hand-written.
Loading the opportunity map…
Method: cross-lens synthesis of framework partial-coverage, adversarial-technique (ATLAS) mapping density, thin threat categories, high-capability source gaps, and citation-validation debt — all recomputed on every rehash. A reading of the public data, not a market claim.